Explore the best Kore.ai alternatives for 2025. Find platforms that deliver better orchestration, compliance, and ROI for enterprise process automation.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
TL;DR
Best for end-to-end, custom AI agent workflows: AgentFlow (Multimodal.dev)
Best for RPA plus AI orchestration: UiPath
Best for IT and HR service automation: Aisera
Best for hybrid cloud orchestration: IBM Watsonx Orchestrate
Best for ServiceNow-native environments: ServiceNow (Now Assist + AI Agents)
Best for orchestration-first enterprise automation: Beam.ai
Best for easy deployment by business teams: Relevance AI
Best for Google Cloud users: Google Agentspace
Best for knowledge-centric automation: Sana
Kore.ai Alternatives for Process Automation in 2025
Kore.ai is an enterprise platform known for automating IT service management, HR workflows, and customer support using conversational AI. It offers strong NLP (natural language processing), out-of-the-box ITSM integrations, and prebuilt templates that speed up deployment in service-heavy environments.
However, as automation strategies evolve in 2025, many enterprises, especially those in regulated sectors, need platforms that go beyond chatbots and ticket deflection. The focus has shifted toward full-process orchestration, governance-first architecture, and agentic automation that can mirror human decision-making across complex workflows.
If you're looking for Kore.ai alternatives that provide deeper orchestration, compliance, or broader enterprise fit, these are the top contenders.
1. AgentFlow (Multimodal.dev)
For regulated enterprises automating high-stakes workflows like underwriting or claims, AgentFlow offers the most governance-forward approach to agentic AI.
Unlike Kore.ai, which centers on conversational experiences, AgentFlow orchestrates full workflows with explainability, model selection, and auditability built in.
Its standout strengths include private deployments, confidence-scored decisions, and templates purpose-built for finance and insurance, domains where compliance isn’t optional.
AgentFlow uniquely balances technical flexibility with business configurability, enabling SMEs to guide agent behavior without code. While it doesn't prioritize chatbot UX, that’s a conscious trade-off in favor of governed, production-grade automation.
Pricing: Custom enterprise pricing; SOC 2 Type II deployments
2. UiPath
UiPath is best suited for enterprises modernizing legacy desktop or back-office workflows. While Kore.ai focuses on natural language interfaces, UiPath excels in system-level orchestration through robotic process automation (RPA) and AI-enhanced document processing.
Its strengths lie in automating legacy systems and offering deep administrative controls for governance. UiPath’s ability to combine RPA with machine learning makes it powerful for bridging old and new systems.
However, it requires specialized RPA knowledge and lacks the conversational fluency of Kore.ai.
Key Features: RPA, document processing, legacy system automation, AI Center
Best For: Enterprises modernizing legacy RPA estates
Pros: Deep automation capability, hybrid deployment, strong admin tooling
Cons: Requires RPA expertise, not chat-focused
Pricing: Tiered pricing based on bot usage
3. Aisera
For teams automating IT, HR, and support requests, Aisera offers a more plug-and-play experience than Kore.ai.
Like Kore.ai, it focuses on service desk workflows, but it emphasizes prebuilt integrations and certifications like HIPAA and SOC 2 for quicker deployment in enterprise environments.
Aisera offers strong overlap with Kore.ai but differentiates with its ease of setup and pre-trained virtual agents. It's an attractive option for organizations that want fast automation with minimal configuration. Its trade-off is a narrower focus, it’s not built for cross-functional or multi-agent workflows.
Key Features: AI service desk, virtual agents, ITSM/HR integrations
Best For: IT and HR teams seeking quick automation wins
Pros: Easy setup, enterprise-ready compliance, fast time-to-value
Cons: Narrower scope beyond service desk
Pricing: SaaS model with enterprise options
4. IBM Watsonx Orchestrate
IBM Watsonx Orchestrate fits best in hybrid enterprise environments that already depend on IBM Cloud or software infrastructure. Unlike Kore.ai, which is centered on chat-based interactions, Watsonx is designed to automate back-end workflows using digital workers and task orchestration.
Its main strengths are hybrid deployment flexibility, responsible AI tooling, and deep enterprise support. For companies with large IBM investments, it’s a natural path to orchestrated automation.
The trade-off is that conversational UI is not a core focus.
Key Features: Digital workers, hybrid deployment, governance frameworks
Best For: IBM-aligned enterprises needing hybrid automation
Pros: Deep support, hybrid flexibility, responsible AI integration
Cons: Less focused on conversational UX
Pricing: Part of the broader Watsonx suite
5. ServiceNow (Now Assist + AI Agents)
ServiceNow’s Now Assist expands the capabilities of the company’s dominant workflow platform by embedding agentic automation directly into existing ITSM, HR, and customer support modules. Unlike Kore.ai, which builds around conversation design, ServiceNow integrates AI agents into its native process engine, offering tighter control and better alignment with ServiceNow data.
It stands out with enterprise-grade governance features like Control Tower and native role-based access. For teams already committed to the ServiceNow ecosystem, this is the most efficient path to embedded automation.
The main limitation is that it delivers the most value only within the ServiceNow platform.
Key Features: Embedded AI agents, Control Tower, native governance
Best For: Enterprises already using ServiceNow
Pros: Deep platform alignment, strong governance, process-native AI
Cons: Less value outside the ServiceNow ecosystem
Pricing: Add-on to existing ServiceNow licensing
6. Beam.ai
Beam.ai is best suited for teams looking to operationalize orchestration across a growing catalog of business processes. Unlike Kore.ai, which centers on conversation-led automation, Beam focuses on agent lifecycle management and compliance observability.
Its advantages include a managed orchestration layer and a growing template library tailored to enterprise needs. Beam supports RBAC, monitoring, and deployment flexibility, important for compliance-conscious buyers.
However, its conversational features are limited and its enterprise references are still maturing.
Pricing: SaaS subscription with enterprise options
7. Relevance AI
Relevance AI targets mid-market teams seeking quick wins with no-code AI workers for internal processes.
While Kore.ai focuses on robust conversational design, Relevance excels in simplicity, allowing non-technical teams to deploy agents fast. Its SOC 2 Type II compliance and data privacy claims make it enterprise-ready, even if its feature set is narrower.
Relevance works well for business teams in sales, support, or ops that need automation without deep orchestration complexity. The downside is limited scalability for complex, cross-functional workflows.
Key Features: AI workers, no-code interface, compliance focus
Best For: Mid-market teams with minimal IT support
Pros: Fast deployment, business-friendly, plug-and-play
Cons: Limited depth in multi-step orchestration
Pricing: Tiered SaaS pricing
8. Google Agentspace
Google Agentspace fits companies already committed to the Google Cloud ecosystem. Unlike Kore.ai, which is platform-agnostic, Agentspace provides native hooks into Workspace and Vertex AI for tightly integrated automation.
It’s ideal for teams using Gmail, Docs, or BigQuery as part of their operational stack. Advantages include built-in security policies, enterprise-grade controls, and simplified provisioning.
However, its product maturity is limited, and adoption outside of GCP remains low.
Sana is designed for knowledge-heavy environments that require accurate search and action across unstructured data.
While Kore.ai excels in ticket and task automation, Sana differentiates with its RAG-style retrieval pipeline and permission-aware automation. It offers a strong compliance profile and is especially valuable in legal, healthcare, and documentation-heavy fields.
The platform shines in scenarios where grounded responses and document context matter more than dialog trees. Its trade-off is limited applicability to transactional workflows like ITSM or HR service desks.