How to Choose an LLM Agent Framework: Vertical vs. Horizontal

What Is an LLM Agent Framework?

An LLM agent framework is a system that enables large language models (LLMs) to interact with tools, APIs, and environments to complete complex tasks. It manages the flow of prompts, memory, actions, and results, allowing LLM based agents to reason, plan, and execute multi‑step operations beyond simple text generation.

The Difference Between an LLM Agent Framework and an AI Agent Framework

LLM agent frameworks are purpose-built to make large language models agentic, adding memory, tool use, and step-by-step reasoning. They focus on language-driven tasks like answering questions, summarizing, or executing workflows using natural language. Examples include LangChain, LangGraph, and OpenAI models.

In contrast, general AI Agent frameworks are broader. They support multiple AI models—not just LLMs—and enable agents to act autonomously in digital or physical environments. These frameworks can handle multi-modal input (like images or sensor data), and are common in robotics, autonomous vehicles, or process automation.

While LLM agent frameworks wrap language models with decision logic, AI agent frameworks support more complex, autonomous behavior across a wider range of inputs and use cases.

Key takeaway: LLM agent frameworks focus on turning large language models into agents, while AI agent frameworks offer broader infrastructure for any type of autonomous system—LLM-based or not.

Why Framework Choice Matters

Selecting an LLM agent framework isn’t a cosmetic decision. Choosing between vertical and horizontal LLM agent frameworks depends on your specific needs and use case. It will determine real‑world ROI, delivery timelines, and audit outcomes.

The wrong framework can stall multi‑agent projects. Integration, compliance, memory, and scale all hinge on the underlying architecture:

• Workflow fit determines whether agents can solve complex tasks like data analysis or code generation.
• Tool integration decides how easily agents tap external data sources and custom APIs.
• Governance is crucial in finance and healthcare, where every agent’s action needs an audit trail.
• Scalability: A flimsy framework collapses when hundreds of agents share memory and call tools simultaneously.

A solid framework protects against these pitfalls with managed tool routing, retrieval‑augmented memory, structured logging, and low‑code orchestration.

What Is a Vertical LLM Agent Framework?

A vertical LLM agent framework is purpose-built for specific domains or industries. Examples include frameworks specialized for healthcare, finance, insurance, legal services, or customer support offering:

• Domain expertise: pre-built ontologies plus industry-specific extraction models and reasoning chains (e.g., ACORD, FIBO).
• Compliance guardrails: built with domain-specific regulations in mind (SOC 2, GDPR, HIPAA).
• Pre-integrated tools: KYC APIs, actuarial libraries, regulatory databases, and other domain utilities.
• Optimized workflows: ready-made, fine-tuned templates that accelerate common industry tasks and processes.

Example: AgentFlow (Finance & Insurance)

Benefits: multi-agent system, faster deployment, native SOC 2, explainability, and lower long‑term TCO.

AgentFlow is a vertical LLM agent framework designed specifically for finance and insurance. These industries face some of the toughest challenges for AI: regulatory scrutiny, data sensitivity, and legacy infrastructure. We created AgentFlow to solve those problems with an agent-first platform that balances control and automation.

At its core, AgentFlow helps companies configure, deploy, and orchestrate multiple AI agents while integrating humans and third-party systems into the loop. The modular framework allows teams to automate entire workflows or just the steps they’re ready to hand off.

Here’s how the six core modules work together:

1. Configure: Create domain-specific AI agents with built-in security, tool integrations, and flexible deployment options. For example, spin up a “KYC Validator” agent that queries sanctions APIs and screens PEP lists.
2. Orchestrate: Design multi-agent workflows using a visual DAG builder. A typical claims flow might involve a sequence like: Document AI → Conversational AI → Decision AI → Report AI.
3. Ingest: Load batches of documents into a vector store with validation and error handling. Use it for things like loan packets, loss-run reports, or SEC filings.
4. Monitor: Get real-time dashboards showing latency, token usage, and model confidence. You can automatically flag any output below a defined threshold (e.g., 0.8 confidence score).
5. Review: Build human-in-the-loop feedback into your workflows. Underwriters or analysts can approve, correct, or comment on agent outputs before they’re finalized.
6. Fine-tune: Continuously improve agents using feedback and new data. New form types, for instance, can be supported in hours, not months, thanks to built-in retraining workflows.

AI Agents Inside AgentFlow

AgentFlow includes several pre-built AI agents where each autonomous agent is tied to a specific business function. We grouped them into four main categories with specific key features:

Process agents:

• Unstructured AI converts PDFs, images, and other unstructured inputs into structured JSON.
• Document AI extracts clean field-level data using your custom schema.

Search agents:

• Database AI searches structured data (SQL, NoSQL, etc.) with natural language queries.
• Conversational AI queries unstructured content like policies or call transcripts.

Decide agents:

• Decision AI automates approvals, validations, and scoring tasks—while optionally routing low-confidence outputs for human review.

Create agents:

• Report AI generates compliance-ready documents: claims memos, credit summaries, board reports, and more.

Together, this multi agent framework covers every phase of the enterprise data lifecycle—from ingestion to decision-making and reporting. But if your legal or risk team wants to stay hands-on, AgentFlow lets you build human checkpoints into every step.

Built-In Compliance, Security, and Trust

To meet the demands of regulated industries, AgentFlow includes:

• Confidence Scores: Every AI output includes a quantifiable measure of certainty—so humans know when to review.
• Explainability: Agents generate traceable reasoning paths, making it easy to understand how a decision was reached.
• Audit Trails: All agent actions are logged with timestamps and metadata for compliance and review.

Deployments can run in your own infrastructure. Whether that’s on-prem or in a dedicated cloud instance, so you maintain full data ownership and eliminate third-party risks.

Built‑in value:

• Zero‑trust deployment via AWS & Azure Marketplace AMIs—no data leaves the VPC.
• Explainable decision traces—each agent logs tool calls, intermediate steps, and final answer with token‑level audit.
• Weeks to production rather than quarters, thanks to domain templates.

Real Use Case: 80 % Cost Reduction in Lending

Read our customer story on how Direct Mortgage Corp. cut loan‑processing costs by 80 % and approved applications 20x faster by chaining Document AI and Decision AI agents in AgentFlow—no custom code required.

Bottom line: AgentFlow is more than a multi-agent framework. It’s an enterprise-grade platform for building, running, and governing LLM-powered agents in industries where accuracy, transparency, and control are essential.

What Is a Horizontal LLM Agent Framework?

A horizontal framework is domain‑agnostic. They offer generic blocks and vast plugin ecosystems. A horizontal framework provides generic building blocks that apply everywhere. Great examples include LangChain, LangGraph, and LlamaIndex, which have become the preferred way of implementing agents in systems.

Example: LangChain 

Great for rapid prototyping, but you must add compliance, long‑term memory, and domain tools yourself and often hundreds of lines of glue code.

Strengths & Why Developers Love Horizontals

• Flexibility: Plug any LLM (OpenAI, Anthropic, local models).
• Ecosystem: Strong community support—vector DBs, search APIs, and open‑source tools.
• Rapid experiments: Build a prototype bot in a day for diverse use cases.

Limitations & Why Enterprises Hesitate

• No domain ontologies: Developers model data from scratch.
• Compliance is do‑it‑yourself: You bolt on SOC 2 logging and data‑redaction.
• Fragmented memory: Long‑term memory, monitoring, and cost controls require heavy coding.
• Ongoing maintenance: Each tool update risks chain breakage.

Bottom line: Horizontal frameworks shine for experiments and diverse internal tools but can incur a heavy engineering tax for mission‑critical, regulated workloads.

Key Differences Between Vertical and Horizontal Frameworks

As we‘ve said, vertical frameworks like AgentFlow are purpose-built for specific, highly regulated industries. They offer built-in domain knowledge, reducing the need for heavy prompt engineering or manual customization. 

In contrast, horizontal frameworks like LangChain are general-purpose and work across any domain but typically require more setup and ongoing development.

AgentFlow also comes with compliance features out of the box, including SOC 2-level security, GDPR support, and audit trails. Horizontal frameworks leave compliance up to you. Speed is another factor. With pre-built templates and low-code interfaces, AgentFlow can be deployed in weeks. Horizontal frameworks often take months to build and integrate.

Monitoring is also built in with AgentFlow, whereas general frameworks require you to set up your own logs and dashboards.

When to Choose a Vertical Framework

Choose a vertical LLM agent framework when your application demands specialized domain expertise that general-purpose solutions can't easily provide. These frameworks excel in heavily regulated industries like healthcare, finance, or legal services, where compliance features, industry-specific terminology, and specialized data handling come pre-configured. 

They're ideal when time-to-market pressures are high or your team lacks deep technical expertise in LLM engineering. A vertical framework also makes sense when the cost of customizing a horizontal one would exceed the investment in a purpose-built solution.

Here are a few scenarios where vertical frameworks are a better fit:

• Regulated industries: Banking, insurance, capital markets, healthcare, pharmaceuticals, and public sector.
• Mission‑critical workflows: Claims adjudication, loan origination, KYC checks, risk scoring, policy drafting.
• Data‑sensitivity: PII, PHI, or trade‑secret datasets that can’t leave a private cloud.
• Limited engineering capacity: Need a turnkey solution, not months of schema design.
• Audit readiness: Must show explainable reasoning and replay agent actions.

Pro tip: If regulators can stop your business with a fine, pick a vertical solution.

When to Choose a Horizontal Framework

A horizontal LLM agent framework is better when flexibility and customization matter most. These frameworks let you build solutions across multiple domains or unique use cases that don’t fit into vertical offerings.

They offer custom tools, integration capabilities, and strong community support. This allows technical teams to experiment and craft tailored solutions without being limited by industry-specific constraints.

Horizontal frameworks work well for organizations with diverse needs, strong engineering teams, or innovative goals. They’re ideal when you need to combine different capabilities and evolve your implementation over time.

They're especially useful for:

• Early‑stage startups experimenting with multiple use cases.
• Cross‑department tooling: Marketing, HR, and IT each need lightweight agents.
• Academic research where compliance isn’t a gating factor.
• Open‑source preference: Full control over every line of code.
• LLM tinkering: Swapping base models or adding exotic tools.

Popular LLM Agent Frameworks

Several LLM agent frameworks have emerged to support different industries and development styles. Some are built for specific sectors, while others prioritize flexibility and open experimentation.

AgentFlow is a vertical framework purpose-built for regulated sectors like finance and insurance. It comes with pre-integrated tools, compliance features, and domain-specific agents designed to streamline workflows such as claims processing, underwriting, and document analysis.

Causaly serves the life sciences domain with a vertical framework optimized for research workflows. It uses agentic AI to accelerate scientific discovery by helping researchers query vast datasets, identify causal relationships, and generate testable hypotheses faster.

Caidera.ai focuses on life-sciences marketing, offering a vertical framework that automates compliant campaign creation. It uses multiple AI Agents to ingest documents, generate copy, and validate outputs in real time, ensuring regulatory alignment.

LangChain and LangGraph are horizontal frameworks favored by developers building multi-agent systems. They're flexible, dev-friendly, and support complex workflows, though they often require significant customization and coding effort.

AutoGen is another horizontal framework geared more toward research use cases. It enables rapid prototyping of multi-agent systems for tasks like collaborative problem-solving or document analysis.

CrewAI brings a role-based approach to horizontal agent development. It’s designed to coordinate multiple agents with distinct responsibilities, allowing developers to simulate team-based workflows.

Each framework has trade-offs depending on your domain, development capacity, and workflow needs. Vertical frameworks like AgentFlow offer faster deployment, multiple agents, and better compliance. Horizontal options give more flexibility for experimentation and internal tooling.

For deeper stats, read our full review: Best Multi‑Agent AI Frameworks.

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

Organizations often start with horizontal frameworks for prototyping and then either customize them heavily or move to vertical solutions as their needs become clearer. To avoid that, here are some common mistakes teams make when implementing or scaling LLM agent frameworks:

1. Over‑abstracting prompts: Nesting chains inside chains adds latency and token bloat.
2. Ignoring memory budgets: Without retrieval‑augmented memory, agents forget context or burn tokens.
3. No tool‑quality tests: API changes break critical workflows silently.
4. Missing ground truth: Fine‑tuning without labeled data yields drift and hallucinations.
5. Weak monitoring: SOC 2 or HIPAA audits are impossible without dashboards and replay logs.
6. Underestimating token costs: Horizontal toolchains can stack fees—LLM calls, vector DB, cloud‑function runtime.
7. One‑agent mentality: Real solutions need multiple agents—plan, retrieve, reason, verify.

These issues often lead to delays, cost overruns, or unreliable performance.

Questions to Ask Before Deciding on Agent Frameworks LLM

Consider these questions when choosing:

• Data gravity: Where does sensitive data live? Can the framework deploy in your VPC?
• Tool usage: What external APIs must agents call—search, KYC, payment rails?
• Compliance timeline: Do you need out‑of‑the‑box (e.g., SOC2) on day one or next year?
• Skill mix: Can non‑tech users assist in building agents, updating prompts, and configuring workflows, or will DevOps become a bottleneck?
• Scaling roadmap: One agent vs a thousand? How quickly can you scale?
• Cost model: Does pricing align with token, tool, and storage costs?
• Fine‑tuning support: How easily can you bring proprietary data to improve accuracy?
• Specificity of your use case: How unique is your application? More niche needs might benefit from vertical solutions.
• Time-to-market: Vertical frameworks can offer faster deployment for their specific domain.

Ready To See a Vertical Multi-Agent LLM Framework in Action?

Book a demo and see how AgentFlow solves real-world finance and insurance workflows securely, at scale, and without months of custom engineering. Get answers to all your questions, not just a multi-agent infrastructure.

‍